< |||| > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

London 2012

In its bid to host the first sustainable Olympic and Paralympic Games, London 2012 has been hitting headlines nationwide – but not always for the right reasons. Greenliving explores the controversies surrounding London’s promise to deliver a sustainable games…

Pollution Problems

While the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is meeting and indeed surpassing many of their green objectives, the city itself is falling short of expectation. Building work on the Olympic Village might be complete and the Olympic Park on-track, but London pollution risks spoiling it all – not least for the athletes involved.

As the Olympic Games approaches, the UK faces the embarrassing prospect of being taken to court by the EU for failing to meet air quality standards. Some environmental experts see a court case as inevitable and should this occur, the UK risks a £300m fine for breaching EU regulation.

During the 2012 bid, London described its air quality as “good and improving”. However, earlier this year, the BBC reported pollution levels on many London roads as averaging twice that of the recommended levels set by the World Health Organisation.

According to reports, London has the highest levels of the toxic gas nitrogen dioxide in the EU. With less than six months until the games, fears are growing that these high pollution levels could impair the health and performance of Olympic athletes.

Speaking to The Independent, Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at King’s College London, said, “A few athletes may not attain the performances they hoped to and they might spend a few days feeling unwell.”

With the threat of impaired performance looming over athletes, all eyes are on London. Steps are being taken to improve on the situation, but with the City of London’s four-year Air Quality Strategy only being put into effect from 2011, could it be a case of too little too late?

Transatlantic Tickets

Last month it was revealed that the multi- million pound contract to print tickets for the 2012 Olympic games had been awarded to, none other than, a firm based in the USA.

Weldon, Williams & Lick, located in Arkansas, USA, will print 11 million Olympics tickets, which will then be shipped 4,500 miles back to Britain to a UK warehouse.

The announcement came as a huge disappointment to UK businesses. This was heightened further by the recent revelation that just nine per cent of Olympics merchandise has been produced in the UK – an enterprise which could have benefitted the UK economy by a £1bn renevue.

The London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) justified the backlash from critics, claiming the contract was awarded through a “competitive and open” tender.

This tender was apparently run through Compete For; a free service that enables businesses to compete for contract opportunities linked to the London 2012 games and other major public and private sector buying organisations.

A spokesperson from LOCOG commented that as with all contract bids, “a number of criteria are considered including the experience of working on projects of this scale, security, ability to handle large amounts of data and value for money.”

Experience aside, The Green Party has calculated that transporting the 16-tonne consignment across the Atlantic to the UK will create around 77 tonnes of carbon dioxide. This averages the equivalent annual emissions of 15 Londoners.

Far from ideal given London’s current pollution levels.

Lawrence Webb, the UK Independent Party’s London Mayor candidate, described the move to outsource as “a disgrace”, calling it “a kick in the guts to British firms”. So, how will all of this impact Olympics goers? Well, if the ticket sale system hasn’t already caused enough controversy, those lucky enough to be attending an event can expect to incur an additional £6 charge just to have them delivered.

Unsatisfactory sponsors?

In 2010, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) agreed a deal with the Dow Chemical Company to become a global Olympic sponsor. This angered campaigners like Amnesty International, amid claims that Dow faces outstanding lawsuits relating to the 1984 Bhopal gas tragedy.

The Bhopal disaster was a gas leak incident that occurred at the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. UCIL was the Indian subsidiary of the Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), which Dow went on to purchase in 2001.

Considered as one of the world’s worst industrial catastrophes, Madhya Pradesh confirmed 3,787 immediate deaths, but the devastating effects of the leak are ongoing. A 2006 government statement revealed the leak caused a further 558,125 injuries, dramatically increasing the estimated death toll.

A spokesperson for Dow commented, “the 1984 Union Carbide Bhopal incident was a terrible tragedy that none of us in the industry will ever forget. However, it is disappointing that some people are trying to assign blame and responsibility to Dow.”

Dow acquired UCC 16 years after the tragedy and ten years after a $470m settlement agreement, paid by UCC and UCIL and approved by the Indian Supreme Court. Dow added, “The settlement agreement has been reviewed twice and again upheld by the Supreme Court of India in 1991 and 2007.”

According to campaigners, more than 120,000 people still suffer from injuries caused by the accident. However, should Dow be held liable? The state government of Madhya Pradesh now owns and controls the site, so perhaps it is their responsibility to push for remediation?

Whatever the answer, one thing remains clear – this is yet another in a long list of controversies surrounding the 2012 Olympic games.


Emily Conradi is a freelance writer with over four years’ experience in lifestyle and consumer publishing, covering food and drink, hobbies and pastimes, celebrity, real life and social issues.

Experienced in PR and marketing, she regularly reviews new bar and restaurant openings and is most likely to be found in front of her laptop with a good cheese board and a glass of red wine.

www.emilyconradi.co.uk


4 Responses to “London 2012”

  1. Greenliving Magazine » Blog Archive » London 2012 | London 2012 Says:

    [...] more here: Greenliving Magazine » Blog Archive » London 2012 Related Posts:Building Work for London 2012 Olympic Games Complete on Time … Building and [...]

  2. Greenliving Magazine » Blog Archive » London 2012 | Captainslacko's Green Living Tips Says:

    [...] the original post here: Greenliving Magazine » Blog Archive » London 2012 Be Sociable, Share! Tweet(function() {var s = document.createElement('SCRIPT'), s1 = [...]

  3. Go Green With The Green Party | Green Living Guide Says:

    [...] partnership – ours was a marriageArizona Green Candidate Defeats Effort to Remove Him from BallotGreenliving Magazine .recentcomments a{display:inline !important;padding:0 !important;margin:0 [...]

  4. Margaret Says:

    cool!


Leave a comment

All content © Greenliving Magazine 2010  |  Editor login
Website design and build malago.co.uk